<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juror conscription is not a civic duty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blagnet.net/2008/05/23/juror-conscription-is-not-a-civic-duty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/05/23/juror-conscription-is-not-a-civic-duty/</link>
	<description>Discussing libertarian philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cspice</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/05/23/juror-conscription-is-not-a-civic-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>cspice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/?p=199#comment-651</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, I think conscription of any kind is immoral. Your suggestion of having specialists for jurors would work, though it seems that would make it easier for corruption to enter. I have always liked the idea of just paying the market price (or slightly more) for juror service and using a lottery system to pick from a pool of applicants. That would weight the juries slightly on the side of the poorer demographic, but there isn&#039;t much you can do about that-the rich will always avoid it in any voluntary system.

I also find a lot of truth in your statement about the lack of common sense in academia. I think people who specialize so heavily never find the time to really think about philosophy. As a philosophical-minded scientist, I am constantly amazed at how my colleagues can be so smart and ignorant at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, I think conscription of any kind is immoral. Your suggestion of having specialists for jurors would work, though it seems that would make it easier for corruption to enter. I have always liked the idea of just paying the market price (or slightly more) for juror service and using a lottery system to pick from a pool of applicants. That would weight the juries slightly on the side of the poorer demographic, but there isn&#8217;t much you can do about that-the rich will always avoid it in any voluntary system.</p>
<p>I also find a lot of truth in your statement about the lack of common sense in academia. I think people who specialize so heavily never find the time to really think about philosophy. As a philosophical-minded scientist, I am constantly amazed at how my colleagues can be so smart and ignorant at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/05/23/juror-conscription-is-not-a-civic-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/?p=199#comment-596</guid>
		<description>On the survey... false dichotomy! You left out the obvious technocratic sociology-minded solution, which is to have proportionate representation from both groups, according to their prevalence in the total pool of potential jurors. Gotta work race in there somewhere too, though I&#039;m not sure how.

Thanks for the link btw, I&#039;ve reciprocated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the survey&#8230; false dichotomy! You left out the obvious technocratic sociology-minded solution, which is to have proportionate representation from both groups, according to their prevalence in the total pool of potential jurors. Gotta work race in there somewhere too, though I&#8217;m not sure how.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link btw, I&#8217;ve reciprocated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

