<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scarcity is not shortage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blagnet.net/2008/12/11/scarcity-is-not-shortage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/12/11/scarcity-is-not-shortage/</link>
	<description>Discussing libertarian philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blagnet.net &#187; Water shortage does not equal water scarcity</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/12/11/scarcity-is-not-shortage/comment-page-1/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Blagnet.net &#187; Water shortage does not equal water scarcity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/?p=441#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>[...] some points I made in two previous posts: Water shortages and water-trading between states and Scarcity is not shortage. Some excerpts (italics in original):  The government has blamed the shortage of water on drought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some points I made in two previous posts: Water shortages and water-trading between states and Scarcity is not shortage. Some excerpts (italics in original):  The government has blamed the shortage of water on drought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Z</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/12/11/scarcity-is-not-shortage/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>David Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/?p=441#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>For an &quot;amateur student of economics&quot;, you nailed this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an &#8220;amateur student of economics&#8221;, you nailed this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2008/12/11/scarcity-is-not-shortage/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/?p=441#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Ah! I see he made an encore with even more moranitude in the comments to Radley&#039;s post I linked to above!
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Radley, either you misunderstood my comment or you just didn’t address the main point. I’m not suggesting a government controlled farming industry, we all know how poorly that works. However, gaurantees of a minimum price for a commodity which is above the market value will help create an oversupply. In a free market, when an oversupply occurs, the price of the commodity collapses and causes some suppliers to quit, which then usually leads to a period of scarcity. Are you ok with occasional periods of scarce food or do you not believe that would happen?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And even more:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
This is it in a nutshell:

Assertion 1: A Free market, while the best economic system, are still imperfect(for a lot of reasons) and result in boom and bust cycles.

Assertion 2: Therefore, if you want to smooth out the busts, some perversion must be undertaken.

Assertion 3: This perversion will likely result in suboptimal allocation of resources(too much food, lower efficiency, higher cost). In certain cases, that might be preferable to enduring the bust cycle(too little food).
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, the boom&amp;#8211bust cycle is now a &lt;i&gt;result of the free market system&lt;/i&gt;! I can see our libertarian blagging is doing no good with the dumb masses. And yet they still get to point their guns at us but we don&#039;t at them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! I see he made an encore with even more moranitude in the comments to Radley&#8217;s post I linked to above!</p>
<blockquote><p>
Radley, either you misunderstood my comment or you just didn’t address the main point. I’m not suggesting a government controlled farming industry, we all know how poorly that works. However, gaurantees of a minimum price for a commodity which is above the market value will help create an oversupply. In a free market, when an oversupply occurs, the price of the commodity collapses and causes some suppliers to quit, which then usually leads to a period of scarcity. Are you ok with occasional periods of scarce food or do you not believe that would happen?
</p></blockquote>
<p>And even more:</p>
<blockquote><p>
This is it in a nutshell:</p>
<p>Assertion 1: A Free market, while the best economic system, are still imperfect(for a lot of reasons) and result in boom and bust cycles.</p>
<p>Assertion 2: Therefore, if you want to smooth out the busts, some perversion must be undertaken.</p>
<p>Assertion 3: This perversion will likely result in suboptimal allocation of resources(too much food, lower efficiency, higher cost). In certain cases, that might be preferable to enduring the bust cycle(too little food).
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, the boom&#8211bust cycle is now a <i>result of the free market system</i>! I can see our libertarian blagging is doing no good with the dumb masses. And yet they still get to point their guns at us but we don&#8217;t at them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

