<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blagnet.net&#8217;s quiz of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blagnet.net/2009/04/07/blagnetnets-quiz-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2009/04/07/blagnetnets-quiz-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>Discussing libertarian philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blagnet.net/2009/04/07/blagnetnets-quiz-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blagnet.net/2009/04/07/blagnetnets-quiz-of-the-day/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>Warren G. Harding, in his &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-speechCloud07-DD.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;speech accepting the Republican Party&#039;s nomination for president in 1920&lt;/a&gt;. 

Two observations from reading through the whole thing to find the juicy monetary nuggets: Other parts of it are quite Statolatrist, nationalist, and patriotic, so I didn&#039;t like those parts; and, man, what a long, LOOOOONNNNGGGGG speech. No politician today could ever get away with speaking for that long on end. How incredibly boring it must have been. And I&#039;ve heard he wasn&#039;t a very good public speaker (not by 1920&#039;s standards).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren G. Harding, in his <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-speechCloud07-DD.html" rel="nofollow">speech accepting the Republican Party&#8217;s nomination for president in 1920</a>. </p>
<p>Two observations from reading through the whole thing to find the juicy monetary nuggets: Other parts of it are quite Statolatrist, nationalist, and patriotic, so I didn&#8217;t like those parts; and, man, what a long, LOOOOONNNNGGGGG speech. No politician today could ever get away with speaking for that long on end. How incredibly boring it must have been. And I&#8217;ve heard he wasn&#8217;t a very good public speaker (not by 1920&#8242;s standards).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

